Feasibility of Office-based Operative Hysteroscopy by a Tissue Removal System without Anesthesia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of operative hysteroscopy by a hysteroscopic tissue removal system (HTRS) without anesthesia in women with endometrial polyps (EP) or retained products of conception (RPOC). DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: University-affiliated department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. PATIENTS: Consenting women aged >18 years diagnosed with EP or RPOC from 9/2022 to 8/2023 confirmed by a prior office hysteroscopy. INTERVENTIONS: Office-based vaginoscopic operative hysteroscopy without anesthesia using the Mini-Elite Truclear HTRS. Oral misoprostol was prescribed for cervical ripening. The patients rated intraoperative and 5-minute postoperative pain levels on a visual analog scale, with mild pain defined as a score of 0-4, moderate as 5-7, and severe as 8-10. A successful procedure was defined as complete removal of the pathology. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fifty patients were included in this pilot study, and 47 (94.0%) procedures were completed successfully, including 21/24 (87.5%) cases of EP and all cases of RPOC (26/26, p=.06). No intra- or postoperative complications occurred. The intraoperative pain levels were rated as mild, moderate, and severe by 26 (52.0%), 16 (32.0%) and 8 (16.0%) patients, respectively. Severe intraoperative pain was more common in nulliparous women and those >10 years from their last vaginal delivery, and not associated with patient age, menopausal status, presence of abnormal uterine bleeding, or pathology size. Severe postoperative pain, reported by 5 (10.0%) patients, was significantly associated with removal of EP compared with RPOC, longer operative time, and nulliparity or >10 years from the last vaginal delivery. The procedure was considered acceptable by 46 (92.0%) patients, and 45 (90.0%) would recommend it to a friend/relative. CONCLUSIONS: Office-based operative hysteroscopy by the HTRS is successful and well tolerated by most women, especially for RPOC removal.

Pregnancy with Facial Cleft: 20 Years of Experience at a Single Center.

BACKGROUND: Fetal facial clefts are among the most common congenital anomalies detected prenatally. This finding may lead to termination of pregnancy in some cases. OBJECTIVES: To compare a cohort of fetuses with facial clefts in which the pregnancy was terminated to the cohort of cases that were born with facial clefts. To investigate risk factors for facial clefts. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all women with prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of facial cleft that were managed in our institute. A telephone questionnaire was conducted regarding a positive family history and/or genetic predisposition for facial clefts abnormalities. RESULTS: The final cohort consisted of two group. One group included 54 cases of termination of pregnancy (TOP) that were performed due to cleft lip (CL) or cleft palate (CLP); 27 women answered the telephone questionnaire. The second group comprised 99 women who delivered children with facial cleft during the same period; 60 answered the questionnaire. Only seven cases were diagnosed prenatal. Among the two groups, no correlation to family history was discovered. Of note, there was one case of three consecutive fetuses with CL in one woman, without any significant genetic findings. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to describe an anatomical malformation posing an ethical dilemma before TOP. Primary prevention with folic acid and early sonographic detection of CL/CLP with multidisciplinary consultation should be considered.

Should it really be called a heroic cerclage? The obstetrical results of emergency late second-trimester cerclage compared with early history-indicated elective cerclage: a retrospective trial.

PURPOSE: Women diagnosed with mid-trimester cervical insufficiency and dilatation are offered interventions to salvage and support the cervix, where the mainstay of therapy is emergency cervical cerclage. However, considering the significant morbidity associated with delivery in the extreme prematurity period, some women may opt for pregnancy termination. In addition, it is expected that elective cerclage in a subsequent pregnancy may yield better obstetrical results. The objective of this study was, therefore, to compare the obstetrical outcomes of emergency cerclage versus elective cerclage. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of the pregnancy outcomes of women with a singleton pregnancy who underwent cervical cerclage at our institution between December 2008 and November 2021. Women who underwent emergency cervical cerclage due to painless dilatation in the second trimester were compared with women who underwent elective cerclage. RESULTS: Overall, 32 women who underwent emergency cerclage and 183 women who underwent elective cerclage were included. No cases of iatrogenic membrane rupture were noted during the cerclage procedure. There was no statistical difference between the emergency cerclage group and the elective cerclage group in the primary outcomes: gestational age at delivery (35.8 + 4.7 vs 36.3 + 4.9, p = 0.58, respectively), delivery in the extreme prematurity period (between 24 and 28 gestational weeks, 6.5% vs 2.3%, p = 0.21, respectively), and fetal or neonatal death (6.9% vs 6.3%, p = 0.91, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although there are much less favourable circumstances, emergency cerclage is a safe procedure with comparable obstetrical outcomes to elective cerclage. Patient selection and experienced medical team may play a significant role in those cases.